ANBA I AL SAHAFA I PRESS RELEASE I THE PUK I PESHMERGA I LINKS I CONTACT I HOME

 

KURDISTAN NEWSLINE

August 20, 2002

WHO IS IN CHARGE ?

Despite the recent public scrutiny of the operations of the United Nations Agency World Health Organization (WHO) in Iraqi Kurdistan within the context of the Security Council Resolution 986 Oil-for-Food Program, the organization continues in its attitude of benign negligence and its officials being oblivious to the urgent health and welfare needs of the community.

The sorry state of the implementation, or rather non-implementation, of the urgently needed projects by WHO agency reached such scandalous level that the Exec. Director of the Iraq Program Benon V. Sevan openly expressed his frustration, during his visit to Iraqi Kurdistan in January this year, at the lack of any real effort by WHO and its management to address the health issues of the community in the region. He threatened that unless they make a determined change in their attitude and policies, he would be forced to withdraw the allocated funds from the agency and assign it to another agency capable of carrying out the United Nations mandate.

In addition to the mismanaging of the medical supplies and drugs needed for the people, causing a continuous crisis in providing basic healthcare for a population approximately four million people in the region, the most egregious case of WHO style of management is the project to build a 400-bed for the citizens of Sulaimani (a city with a population of 600,000 lacking a general hospital). This project has been languishing in the corridors of WHO bureaucracy for over four years without any serious effort being made to implement the project. WHO officials continue to make false statements and issue optimistic forecasts without any concrete steps to correct the fundamental flaws in the management style and mindsets of the WHO bureaucrats. The WHO officials in the region continue to behave in an arrogant and authoritarian fashion in their dealings with the local health officials and administrators. For example the new WHO representative in Sulaimani, an incompetent Egyptian national, Mahir Al Sukhen , ignores the need to liaise with local authority officials in his conduct of WHO business.

Another health project assigned to WHO Agency and, for which necessary funds have been allocated for over a year, is the medical section for the Technical Institute in Cham Chamal. The project so far going though the same lackadaisical approach adopted by WHO officials in the way they carry out their projects. Recently, all work came to a standstill on this essential project, because as the WHO officials put it“ the person in charge has gone on leave and has taken all the relevant files with him”.

There are several reasons for the miserable performance of WHO Agency in Iraqi Kurdistan. The first is that there is total lack of accountability and transparency in the way WHO officials carry out their mission within the Iraq Program. The New York Headquarters of Iraq Program management and the coordinating body of UNOCHI in Iraq are completely powerless and do not exercise any authority over the way WHO conducts its affairs. The implementation process is deeply mired in an intense bureaucratic wrangling among WHO in Iraq, UNOCHI, WHO headquarters in Geneva, the regional WHO office in Cairo and the Iraq Program Management headquarters in New York. Although the two offices of Iraq Program and WHO offices are located in the same building in New York, they refuse to liaise with each other as WHO claims that Iraq Program has refused to fund the staffing of an extra person to undertake the task. So as a result all liaison must be done between New York and Geneva, necessitating often costly junket delegation visits between New York and Geneva in order to sort out any serious issues.

Another problem is the way the regional office of WHO in Cairo has exercised its authority over the implementation of WHO operations in Iraq in such a way that has had debilitating effect on the health issues of Kurdistan region. The office, run by a pompous Saudi national by the name of Al Jazzaeri, insists that all issues from personnel appointment to project approval must by authorized by him personally. Of course he occupies that post in perpetuity as his Saudi masters have made sure that he is not subject to the normal United Nations standards of term limitation and can therefore occupy that post until his death. Consequently, huge delays ensue, nepotism in personnel recruitment and subjugation of all the WHO activities to the whims of the Iraqi officials in Baghdad prevail. The WHO organization in Iraq has become a dumping ground for employing incompetent and Kurdophobic Arab nationals, receiving huge salaries and benefits. Their main agenda is to make sure that the full benefits of the resources of the country do not reach the ordinary people of the region, much to the satisfaction of the Iraqi regime.

Killing us with Clichés— Mr. Ramiro Armando de Oliveira Lopes da Silva, the new UN Humanitarian Coordinator for the Oil-for-Food Program has been well briefed about the health crisis and the mismanagement of the WHO Agency. Doctors and health officials hope that he will bring real reform to the way the health sector is dealt with in the region. And next time there is an opportunity to brief the Security Council and Secretary-General Kofi Annan about the status of the Iraq Program, we urge Mr.Benon V. Sevan, the UN Under-Secretary-General and Executive Director of the Office of Iraq Program to give a true picture concerning the shabby way the WHO Agency is implementing the projects under their mandate. We need clear accountability and not fuzzy excuses for not addressing this critical issue.

Ref: The Financial Times July, 6, 2002: UN deal leaves Iraq Kurds at Baghdad's mercy

By Guy Dinmore in northern Iraq and Carola Hoyos, United Nations Correspondent